The first NUCLEUS Advisory Committee meeting: Minds and motivations meet

2017 January: Advisory Committee meeting - banner
The first meeting of the NUCLEUS Executive Board and Advisory Committee in Kleve, Germany. From left to right: Daan Schuurbiers, Annette Klinkert, Caitriona Mordan, Alexander Gerber, Kenneth Skeldon, Emily Webb, Gal Weiss and Maya Halevy (not pictured: Peter Broks, Aleksandra Drecun, Paul Manners, Menelaos Sotiriou, Linda van Dijk, Robin Yee).

Ambition, diversity of perspectives, and depth of thinking were the project strengths singled out by the NUCLEUS Advisory Committee at their first meeting, held 31 January, 2017 at Rhine-Waal University in Kleve, Germany.

The Advisors discussed the project’s challenges, strategy and goals constructively and supportively with the Executive Board. Bringing perspectives from research, policy, industry and public engagement, the Advisors offered counsel based on their own first-hand experiences in science-society projects and initiatives.

Present for the first meeting were:

  • Aleksandra Drecun, President of the Intersection science and innovation action tank (Serbia)
  • Maya Halevy, Director of the Bloomfield Science Museum Jerusalem (Israel)
  • Paul Manners, Director of the National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement (UK) [joined by video]
  • Daan Schuurbiers, Founding Director of the De Proeffabriek responsible innovation consultancy (the Netherlands)
  • Gal Weiss, EU Programs and Contracts Manager for IBM Research (Ireland)

 

From left to right: Daan Schuurbiers, Aleksandra Drecun, Maya Halevy and Gal Weiss

First meeting of the NUCLEUS Advisory Committee. From left to right: Daan Schuurbiers, Aleksandra Drecun, Maya Halevy and Gal Weiss (not pictured: Paul Manners, who joined by video)

 

The external perspectives come at an important time for NUCLEUS, as the project readies itself for the implementation stage. So what did the advisors think of the project progress and potential thus far?

Drecun emphasises the strength of the consortium’s diversity across mandates, organisational formats, geography and prior engagement with RRI. With this in mind, she says, “It is extremely important to support a continuous, proactive exchange of information and discussion among all project partners, thus making good use of such a representative group of people that could mirror real-life RRI multi-stakeholder practice itself.”

“The focus on understanding the meaning and interpretation of RRI in different cultural contexts is very distinctive,” adds Manners. “So much research is now being done in large international collaborations. There are different expectations and assumptions that researchers bring to these projects, and different framings of public engagement.”

The potential to integrate conceptual findings with practical outcomes is a highlight of the project for Schuurbiers. “At the conceptual level, NUCLEUS could contribute to a deeper understanding of RRI. On a more practical level, NUCLEUS could inform researchers and university leaders what it would mean to ‘do’ RRI,” he says. However, he also cautions against overambition: “Rather than trying to present all-encompassing solutions, less could well prove to be more.”

Other advisors who will join the committee, but were unable to attend the meeting, include:

  • Mikkel Bohm, Director of Astra, the Danish STEM national education platform (Denmark)
  • René von Schomberg, Team Leader of Science Policy for the European Commission (Belgium)
  • Jack Stilgoe, Lecturer in Social Studies of Science at University College London (UK)

The long-term goal of NUCLEUS is to develop a set of practical recommendations for leaders of research institutions on how to implement RRI. The Advisory Committee’s experience and feedback will be valuable in strengthening the project’s progress and its policy outcomes.

“Many best practices were very active during previous projects’ lives but were not really embedded,” says Halevy. “A new approach is needed now: to analyse obstacles, identify opportunities, and develop tracks to adopt the results of the best practices.”

“The deep thinking, the desire of the people involved to have a better approach with both the ‘high level’ and the day-to-day practice of RRI, make it a wonderful opportunity for Europe,” said Weiss.

NUCLEUS Advisory Committee meeting


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Upcoming Events

  1. 4th NUCLEUS Conference 2018

    October 11 - October 12

Archives

Categories

Think Tank Event at the University of Twente! Register now!

Technology has become ubiquitous in contemporary society as a means of answering wider societal questions. Much of that technology originates … Read more

RRI in tiny formats for curious audiences

Written by Andrea Troncoso Are you sometimes wondering what kind of activity would be suitable to tackle questions related to … Read more

NUCLEUS Project Welcomes New Consortium Member: Welcome Genome Campus in Cambridge

The ambitious HORIZON 2020 NUCLEUS project has been further strengthened by the joining of the Wellcome Genome Campus in Cambridge, … Read more